| Question 1: Where did you first came in contact with SMW?
|
| Wikipedia
|
| Question 2: When you first came in contact with SMW where did you get your information from? (search engine, mediawiki.org, university etc.)
|
| Wikipedia and Google
|
| Question 3: Considering your circumstances, what kind of problems you think SMW can solve?
|
| Internationalization/translation/mapping of controlled medical terminologies
|
Part II
| Question 4: Why do you think SMW has the potential to solve those problems?
|
| Because of WHO ICD and LexWiki
|
| Question 5: When you looked for some solutions to a problem where did you look (semantic-mediawiki.org etc.)?
|
| Late 2011
|
| Question 6: Does semantic-mediawiki.org provides a good enough introduction in how to start with SMW?
|
| Pretty good.
|
Part III
| Question 7: Could you rate (likert scale) the perceived information density on semantic-mediawiki.org. (1 least satisfied with information provided (found less information than I hoped for); 5 generally satisfied with information provided (found most questions answered); 10 satisfied with information provided (found all information I was looking for) )
|
| 9
|
| Question 8: If semantic-mediawiki.org didn't provide a good enough introduction what would you see as a root cause for the problem (lack of structure, unclear entry points, to much information at the beginning, conceptional difficult to grasp at first etc.)?
|
| Not yet.
|
| Question 9: From your perspective what kind of information is missing on semantic-mediawiki.org?
|
| Enhance the scenarios for demo.
|
| Question 10: If you have to improve the documentation which areas are in need for amendments (max. 3)?
|
| None.
|
Improve the support for ontologies and terminologies.
