Thread:Help talk:Properties and types/Naming convention: Population v. ``Has population...renaming??


 * The naming convention discussion is a good one and is vitally important.
 * has type is easily confused with has population for us newbies (it was for me) and when you're confused by the assignment statement you're not off to a good start.


 * I was confused by the frequent and sometimes erroneous use of Has population::123456 and population::123456

I am still confused by the Berlin example. The annotation avoiding ambiguity is as follows: Germany's capital is called Has capital::Berlin. ↔ Is capital of::Berlin is the capital of Germany.
 * When you say :


 * Are you saying that we're going to create two distinct properties:
 * Has capital
 * Is capital of


 * Perhaps it's my ignorance of the precise meaning of the symbol : "↔"
 * Perhaps you're saying Property names should follow the expected usage, the expected context.
 * Perhaps you're saying something else altogether.